330 research outputs found
Finding a Collective Set of Items: From Proportional Multirepresentation to Group Recommendation
We consider the following problem: There is a set of items (e.g., movies) and
a group of agents (e.g., passengers on a plane); each agent has some intrinsic
utility for each of the items. Our goal is to pick a set of items that
maximize the total derived utility of all the agents (i.e., in our example we
are to pick movies that we put on the plane's entertainment system).
However, the actual utility that an agent derives from a given item is only a
fraction of its intrinsic one, and this fraction depends on how the agent ranks
the item among the chosen, available, ones. We provide a formal specification
of the model and provide concrete examples and settings where it is applicable.
We show that the problem is hard in general, but we show a number of
tractability results for its natural special cases
How many candidates are needed to make elections hard to manipulate?
In multiagent settings where the agents have different preferences,
preference aggregation is a central issue. Voting is a general method for
preference aggregation, but seminal results have shown that all general voting
protocols are manipulable. One could try to avoid manipulation by using voting
protocols where determining a beneficial manipulation is hard computationally.
The complexity of manipulating realistic elections where the number of
candidates is a small constant was recently studied (Conitzer 2002), but the
emphasis was on the question of whether or not a protocol becomes hard to
manipulate for some constant number of candidates. That work, in many cases,
left open the question: How many candidates are needed to make elections hard
to manipulate? This is a crucial question when comparing the relative
manipulability of different voting protocols. In this paper we answer that
question for the voting protocols of the earlier study: plurality, Borda, STV,
Copeland, maximin, regular cup, and randomized cup. We also answer that
question for two voting protocols for which no results on the complexity of
manipulation have been derived before: veto and plurality with runoff. It turns
out that the voting protocols under study become hard to manipulate at 3
candidates, 4 candidates, 7 candidates, or never
- …